CAP
Capability & Product Maturity
What the solution does, how mature it is, and whether the product can support real enterprise or mission use cases.
Ratings & Evidence Intelligence
Evidence-backed ratings for AI, cyber, and vendor-readiness decisions.
ShieldOrbit ratings are not generic rankings. They are evidence-backed readiness profiles that separate product capability, proof quality, verification depth, confidence, exposure risk, customer fit, and market readiness.
Rating Methodology
Back to topA rating should explain why confidence exists — not hide uncertainty behind a single score.
The methodology separates what a product can do, what evidence supports the claim, how deeply it has been verified, where data is restricted, and what gaps must be closed to improve buyer confidence.
1 · Evidence Intake
Vendor proof assets, public signals, compliance documents, control mappings, exposure intelligence, SBOM/AIBOM inputs, and customer-fit context.
2 · Evidence Reasoning
Normalize evidence by type, source, freshness, reliability, consent mode, and relevance to the use case.
3 · Rating Calculus
Score readiness, capability, trust, confidence, evidence coverage, exposure, and market fit separately.
4 · Explainability
Show rationale, supporting evidence, missing proof, residual risk, and improvement actions.
5 · Versioned Profile
Create a reusable profile that can improve over time as evidence, validation, and customer outcomes mature.
Rating Dimensions
Back to topCore dimensions used across vendor, readiness, and evidence intelligence profiles.
EV
Evidence Sufficiency
Quality, coverage, freshness, verification depth, restriction level, and reliability of proof assets.
FIT
Customer / Use-Case Fit
Alignment to buyer persona, sector, mission profile, budget owner, deployment context, and operational need.
SEC
Cyber & Exposure Posture
Security controls, public exposure, attack surface, credential/dark web indicators, and remediation posture.
GOV
Governance & Compliance Readiness
GRC evidence, control mapping, audit readiness, RMF/ATO applicability, AI governance, and regulatory alignment.
SC
Supply Chain Transparency
SBOM, AIBOM, dependencies, vulnerability exploitability, secure SDLC, and supplier confidence.
Rating Packages
Back to topCommercial packages that can mature with the platform.
The first packages can be delivered as evidence-backed profiles, then evolve into recurring ratings, research products, and data feeds.
1
Vendor Readiness Rating
Evidence-backed profile for AI/cyber vendors preparing for enterprise, investor, partner, or public-sector conversations.
2
Government-Ready Rating
RMF, ATO, cATO, SBOM/AIBOM, supply-chain, and mission-readiness profile for government and regulated channels.
3
Portfolio Intelligence Rating
PE, VC, accelerator, or strategic-partner view of portfolio readiness, exposure risk, enterprise adoption gaps, and market fit.
Who Uses Ratings
Different buyers need the same core question answered: how much trust is justified?
Vendors
Use ratings to show readiness, strengthen proof assets, close gaps, and improve buyer confidence.
Enterprise Buyers
Use ratings to shortlist vendors, compare readiness, validate evidence, and scope deeper due diligence.
Investors & Partners
Use ratings to evaluate market readiness, customer-fit strength, exposure risk, and portfolio improvement paths.
Government / Regulated Markets
Use ratings as a pre-readiness view for RMF/ATO, supply chain, critical infrastructure, and mission-fit discussions.
Systems Integrators
Use ratings to qualify ecosystem partners and build evidence-backed solution pods.
Analyst / Data Buyers
Use ratings as a structured, evidence-weighted lens across AI, cyber, vendor, and market-readiness categories.
Ratings become more powerful when evidence is structured.The ratings page now supports vendor packages, investor conversations, and future data/research products.
Discuss Ratings & Evidence